Exodus #23, part 2
Natural Law copyright by Anthony Hargis
(Copyright notice: to lawfully reproduce all or part of this article, the following attribution must be included: “Natural-law copyright by Anthony Hargis, redressone.wordpress.com)
It appears to have begun some twenty-five centuries ago – possibly much earlier. When the Israelites returned from their sojourn in Babylon, they carried with them what would later become known as the Law of Moses.
This law is based on the promise made by the Jewish LORD to Abram, later renamed Abraham. (In my copy of the Bible, The Standard Revised edition, the Old-Testament god is rendered “LORD”, with “ORD” in small caps (not available in this blog), and the New-Testament god is rendered “Lord”; a footnote on page 43 explains, “The word LORD when spelled with capital letters, stands for the divine name, YHWH, which is here connected with the verb hayah to be.” It would, therefore, seem reasonable to regard LORD as referring to one of the Jewish gods, and Lord as the Christian god.)
To your descendants I give this land, from the River of Egypt to the great river, the river Euphrates, the land of the Ken’ites, the Ken’izzites, the Kad’monites, the Hittites, the Per’izzites, the Reph’aim, the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Gir’gashites, and the Jeb’usites (Gen, xv, 18-21).
Sixteen or seventeen generations later, the LORD elaborated on this promise, which has become known as the Covenant of Moses,
The LORD your God will clear away these nations before you little by little; you may not make an end of them at once, lest the wild beasts become too numerous for you. But the LORD your God will give them over to you, and throw them into great confusion, until they are destroyed. And he will give their kings into your hand, and you shall make their name perish from under heaven; not a man shall be able to stand against you, until you have destroyed them. (Deut, vii, 22)
And if you obey the voice of the LORD your God, being careful to do all his commandments which I command you this day, the LORD your God will set you high above all the nations of the earth… The LORD will establish you as a people holy to himself, as he has sworn to you, if you keep the commandments of the LORD your God, and walk in his ways. And all the peoples of the earth shall see that you are called by the name of the LORD; and they shall be afraid of you… (Deut, xxviii, 1, 9-10, 12)
Thus, while the LORD promised to the descendants of Abram the domination of ten nations – or tribes, the Covenant of Moses expanded it to “all the nations of the earth.”
It is a kind of domination that men, even in our age, fail to give due regard. After all, with a history of crusades, inquisitions, witch hunts, dark ages relative to Persia, Egypt, Greece, Rome, Europe, among others – who would imagine such god-commanded genocides?
These two covenants define the difference between Zionist Jews and non-Zionist Jews: the former believe that their god gave them the land described in the promise made to Abram while other Jews believe their god gave them, by the Covenant of Moses, the entire world to enslave. In modern terms, we would say that Zionist Jews are national socialists (or, totalitarians) while other Jews are international socialists.
Normally when one group of men enslaves another, it is only a matter of time before those enslaved rise up and, in a fit of rage, eliminate and throw off their tormentors – despite all the religious clothing worn by the latter. Thus, slaves would live in comparative freedom until another group of men came along to enslave them anew.
It was the inevitability of slave revolts that caused the LORD to require the children of Israel to dominate nations “little by little”, and under authority of native rulers (“And he will give their kings into your hand…”). This did not, and does not, stop slave revolts; it only operated to direct the fury and gore to the native ruler – not against the Children of Israel, the architects and perpetrators of oppression; at least in most cases. In other words, early Jews learned that the holy activities of murder and plunder were more efficient and less prone to retaliation if done with tax assessments and by apparent authority of a native ruler (selected and dominated by them) than if done with a sword in their hands.
Examples of this procedure abound in original histories from Sargon I of Babylon to the present.
A few random examples:
At the coronation of Richard I of England, he requested his Jewish money lenders and tax collectors not to participate in the celebrations. They ignored his request and went into the streets among the celebrating peasants, acted very obnoxiously and provoked hostile reactions. Richard sent soldiers into the streets to protect his tax collectors but peasants were so enraged that the soldiers withdrew for their own safety. Crowds proceeded to Jewish homes and plundered them, killing several Jews. Word spread to other parts of England where the violence was duplicated. Before sunrise March 16, 1190, a body of men entered York and proceeded to the house of a Jew that had been killed in London; they massacred his wife and children, pillaged and burned the house. This sent alarms thru-out the area, Jews, five hundred men, their wives and children, obtained refuge at the governor’s castle; angry peasants besieged the castle. After several days, Jews panicked, cut the throats of their children and wives; and stabbed each other except for a few who requested baptism. The crowd agreed to the proposal; when Jews opened the doors, peasants came in and slaughtered the remaining Jews. From there, the crowd proceeded to the Catholic church and demanded possession of bonds Jews had deposited there for greater security, and burned them in the nave of the church. (Historians’ History of the World, vol. xviii, 308-9; or Encyclopedia Judaica (1974)article “York”.)
Pedro came to the throne of Castile in 1351. He became well known for his senseless murders; he killed enemy and loyal friend with equal ease. Among his victims are listed his father’s wife, a half brother, an infante cousin and his wife, his aunt and, after six years of captivity, his young Queen Blanche – to name a very few. It seems his favorite method of destruction was to have his victims clubbed to death in their chambers while kinsfolk and household watched the ceremony, as they literally stood “ankle deep in blood.” His mother thought it wise to fly into exile instead of remaining within her son’s reach. Some of these, and other, murders were done to protect his crown, some for plunder and others, for… historians have found no reason.
Finally, in 1369, he was defeated by his half brother Henry, who had lost several family members to Pedro, including his mother. When the two came face to face, they fell upon one another and Henry managed to wound Pedro and then, in a furious rage, hacked off his head with a dagger. (Historians’ History of the World, Williams, editor, volume x, 73-92)
Owing to these and many other deeds, the title of “the Cruel” was attached to his name; and “Pedro used none but Jews as his tax-gatherers.” (Sachar, Abraham Leon (first president of BrandeisUniversity), A History of the Jews, 5th ed. 205.)
Many other examples are available from Israel Shahak (Jewish History, Jewish Religion, online); he thinks that Jews should acknowledge their many crimes and make amends for them.
Nicholas Lysson examines the role of Jewish tax collectors from the context of the famine enforced by Judeo-Bolsheviks in Ukraine from 1932-7, http://desip.igc.org/HolocaustAndHolodomor.html
According to the Jewish method of operation, after each nation had been looted to a Stone-Age condition, it was to be utterly destroyed – a god-commanded destruction, “and you shall make their name perish from under heaven”.
Furthermore, god’s little darlings aimed at nothing less than world domination to the end of time. The stories of the Old Testament make this very clear; here is only a partial listing of the many declarations that this covenant of world conquest is to be perpetual: Gen, xvii, 5-13; Ex, xxiii, 21; xxviii, 43; xxix, 28, 42; xxx, 10, 21, 31; xxxi, 16; Lev, xxiii, 14, 21, 31, 41; xxiv, 3, 8, 9; Deut, xviii, 5.
This perpetuity is symbolized by various ceremonies, mutilations, holidays, and costumes among other things and activities. The first of these symbols is circumcision; by this ceremony (or mutilation), Jewish males become parties to the covenant of Moses, “So shall my covenant be in your flesh an everlasting covenant.” (Gen, xvii, 10-13)
Accordingly, when it was learned that many Jews fleeing the collapse of tyranny in Russia had not been circumcised, arrangements were made to correct this ‘oversight.’ (Isn’t it comical: “Jews fleeing the collapse of tyranny”?) By this ceremony, their rapine under Soviet “authority” was ratified, and brought under the mantle of God-protected and God-mandated activity. (L. A. Times, 90 Nov 24, F-18)
Apparently, Jewish females have no official part in this plan; they serve the purpose of talking masturbation devices – for Jewish men as well as powerful goyim. Occasionally they are given over to powerful goy for the double-purposes of prostitute and spy, as in the case of Sarah (Abraham’s wife, who was lent to Pharaoh, among others), Esther, Poppea (Nero’s second wife: she murdered his mother and his eighteen-years-old first wife) and Stalin’s Jewish wife.
For domination of nations into perpetuity to be successful, it was, and is, necessary that the aim and procedures be concealed from those who are to be its victims; for, if the oppressed should ever properly identify who their oppressors are, the latter will suffer the same fate as ordinary slaveholders who stupidly wear no mask as they torment their slaves beyond the threshold of endurance.
Jews conceal the murderous nature of their congregation right in the spotlight. Passover and Purim are two of their most visible holidays; and, by these holidays, Jews renew and perpetuate the Covenant of Moses – they sanctify their aim of world destruction a god-protected, god-mandated activity. Passover celebrates the murder of Egyptian first-born, both man and beast; this could have numbered in the hundreds of thousands. Purim celebrates the murder of over seventy-five thousand reluctant taxpayers, “from India to Ethiopia.” I call these murdered people “tax-payers” because the man that orchestrated the slaughter, Mordecai, was the number two tax-collector (beneath the king) in the Babylonian-Assyrian empire; at least according to the book of Esther.
And, after forty-five centuries – and possibly ten millennia – of unbroken tyranny, these people, chosen by the LORD, invented by them, have a terrible price to pay; and, each year, that goes by without redress, adds to that price.
Accordingly, Jewish (Hebrew or Israelite) priests and scribes invented stories by which to demonstrate rules and procedures for world conquest, and to conceal responsibility for attendant crimes.
The general procedure (or, the ‘sequence of events’ referred to earlier) for conquest consists of five parts: members of the congregation are to a) disperse into all nations; b) enter into tax-collecting professions of each country; c) loot each nation to a Stone-Age condition; d) conduct a mass genocide of prostrate slaves/victims and then e) exit the country.
Tax-collecting professions are divided into three categories: simple collection of taxes; privileged industries or trades; and offices. By the first we have the ordinary thief who obtains a license from a king to march into homes, businesses and ships and take whatever he can lay his hands on. By privileged trades, a man or group of men pay a sum of money (say, 20,000 shekels) to a monarch or priest for a monopoly regarding a particular product. This monopoly excludes competition within a particular territory and allows the holder to sell his product for two, three or four times the unfettered price of the product; this allows the monopolist to recover the money he paid to the king – and realize a return on his money historically ranging from five to twenty times the amount paid to a king, bishop or some other puppet autocrat; the part not paid to a king is historically known as “waste”. By an office, an applicant pays a similar sum to the king for the office of judge, governor, or general; he then goes to his assigned “jurisdiction” and conducts a general, and legalized, plunder, with similar proportions paid to king and kept by office holder.
Parts (a), (b) and (e) are required for relatively obvious reasons. Part (c), the looting to a Stone-Age condition, may not be a requirement; but it is certainly a natural consequence of what happens when a society places power into the hands of vultures.
Most observers, in their holy innocence, would ask, “The country has been looted to a Stone-Age condition; why is it necessary to kill as many of its inhabitants as possible – and blot its memory from the history of man?” The sole reason for this part is to destroy witnesses and evidence of crimes perpetrated by the chosen race. This gives less warning to future victims. This genocide has evolved to the point where Jews everywhere are exhorted by their rabbis and priests to spy on their neighbors and report any that express anti-Jewish or anti-commie sentiments. People who make it to this list are particularly targeted for extermination after Jews loot each nation to a Stone-Age condition – unless they are murdered sooner. Thus, Jews begin very early for this mass genocide by making this list of dissidents, which can be in the making twenty, thirty, even fifty years.
Babylon was an early documented example of this utter destruction. When Jeremiah sent the Israelite hierarchy to Babylon– where they studied and wrote the Law of Moses, he told them to “build houses and live in them, and plant gardens and eat their produce, take wives and have plenty of sons and daughters.” He also told them to “seek the welfare of [seek employment with] the city, and to pray for its welfare; for, in its welfare, you will find your welfare [booty].” (Jer, xxix, 4-7, brackets added)
Israelite scribes and priests, who wrote this history long after it was supposed to have happened (see the article, ‘Biblical Literature’ in Encyclopedia Britannica, 15th ed), then made Jeremiah promise these exiles that, after seventy years, they would return to Jerusalem; and that the LORD would punish the king of Babylon and his subjects for their “iniquity” by “making the land (Babylon) an everlasting waste.” (Jer, xxv, 12)
Jeremiah makes the LORD describe Nebuchadrezzar as “the king of Babylon, my servant” (Jer, xxv, 9). To those who must regard the Bible as the “word of God”, this means that Nebuchadrezzar was selected, appointed and dominated by Israelite priests, such as Jeremiah; in this capacity, he had to perform as these priests instructed, or else he would be replaced or poisoned. (Jer, xxv, 8-12)
That Nebuchadrezzar is described as the servant of the LORD at a time when the former is supposed to have held Israelites in captivity may seem puzzling to those trying to make sense of the scene. It is puzzling because the Bible tells only a part of the story. At the time in question, there is no evidence, outside the Bible, that Israelites existed; but there is plenty of hard evidence – as in clay tablets – that Babylon and Nebuchadrezzar existed; and these same clay tablets mention nothing about Israelites.
In the year 689 BCE, Sennacherib, king of Assyria, razed Babylon to the ground owing to incessant rebellious activity by the city; this rebellious activity was occasioned by Sennacherib’s refusal to “take the hands” of Bel-Merodach, the chief god of the Babylonian pantheon, which would have legitimized his rule, at least in the eyes of Babylonian priests. After Sennacherib’s death, his son, Esarhaddon, as king of Assyria, tried to reverse the damage; among his acts, he took measures to “re-people the city with priests and people” to replace those that had been murdered by Sennacherib. There was a “celebration of reconciliation’ but he did not “take the hands” of Bel-Merodach. The situation remained such until Nabopolassar became king of Babylon, who began “a new era of architectural activity”; his son, Nebuchadrezzar ii, made “Babylon one of the wonders of the world.” (Encyclopedia Britannica, (11th), vol. 3, 98, 105)
To accomplish these actions required an influx of many people with many skills. Accordingly, Jeremiah “sent from Jerusalem to the elders of the exiles, and to the priests, the prophets… the eunuchs, the princes (military officers) of Judah and Jerusalem, and the craftsmen, and the smiths”. (Jer, xxix, 1-2)
Altho these “exiles” are represented by the Bible as “Israelites”, I regard such as very doubtful. At the time in question, the Babylonian priesthood blanketed the land from Elam (just east of Babylon) to the Mediterranean; there is not a trace of Israelite priests in the clay tablets; thus, there was a temple and priesthood in Jerusalem that was subservient to Babylon. And so, those sent to Babylon to rebuild it were the excess portion of the priesthood and people who lived in Jerusalem.
According to my research, the Babylonian priesthood, about 700 BCE, came to the conclusion that it was time for a major face change. Owing to numerous predations and slaughters sanctioned by this priesthood – over the privious thousand years, it was becoming almost impossible to obtain obedience thru-out the territory which it dominated. As I see it now, the surgery included a) a second rewriting of the Babylonian religious legends (the first was during the time of Hammurabi); b) a renaming of the Babylonian priesthood to the “children of Israel”; c) a mass migration to Jerusalem; and d) an erasure of the existence and history of Babylon.
This explains why there is no evidence of the nation of Israelites, outside the Bible, prior to about 400 BCE. Herodotus is an authority here: he traveled widely thru-out Asia Minor, Egypt, and North Africa; he named every tribe, every river, every stream, every mountain range and lake – and never once encountered a single Jew, Israelite or Hebrew, a time when Israelites were supposed to have been very numerous, and very influential.
It explains why priests and prophets of Jerusalem, such as Jeremiah, regarded Nebuchadrezzar as a servant of their god, while, at the same time, Nebuchadrezzar, as king of Babylon, had to “take the hands” of Bel, which made him the servant of Bel and the Babylonian priesthood. The only way this makes sense is that, at the time in question, priests and prophets of Jerusalem were members of the Babylonian priesthood, which was in the process of changing its name and center of operation.
It explains why Babylon simply disappears from history: there was no great natural catastrophe or military conquest to cause its disappearance; it was erased by forces from within. Babylon was to its age as the combination of London, New York, Rome and Thailand is to our age. Babylon was a world center for commerce and finance, religion and sleaze. Such cities do not disappear but by very comprehensive planning, patient execution and unprecedented desperation.
This topic is very big; and here I give only a small sampling of my findings.
The hospitality – ordered by Israelite-Babylonian priests – given to Israelite exiles had to be represented as an “iniquity” so as to conceal the true relationship between Israelite priests and their puppet kings, and to throw the blame for Israelites’ crimes (as tax-collectors, monopolists and money lenders) onto those same kings.
After these Israelites left Babylon, it practically vanished from the face of the earth; its disappearance was so complete that historians and commentators two thousand years ago thought the stories about Babylon were pure fable, with no substance in reality. Thus, it was an “everlasting waste” for at least twenty centuries. In the middle of the nineteenth century archeologists began to discover large numbers of clay tablets from the sands of the country of two rivers; these tablets brought Babylon back to reality, and men had to rewrite their history books.
Twenty-five centuries ago, Babylon was a world power; thru its priesthood, it dominated the most economically-active territory on the earth, from India to Ethiopia and even into Asia Minor. Such civilizations do not simply disappear from sight. There have to be plausible reasons. The Old Testament tells us precisely what happened: a few Israelites went to Babylon and entered into tax-collecting professions; they became king-makers (Nebuchadrezzar was their “servant”); they sent news that some four thousand tax-collecting positions were ready and waiting for other Israelites. Jeremiah sent close to forty-six hundred Israelites to Babylon, on three different occasions, “to serve” Nebuchadrezzar (Jer, lii, 28-30) (these included elders, priests, prophets, the queen mother, eunuchs, the nobility (that is, army officers) of Judah and Jerusalem, craftsmen and smiths, Jer, xxix, 1-4); they looted the country to a Stone-Age condition in sixty years; they left; and the country disappeared from history. These facts, reported by Israelites, tell us approximately what happened, and who was culpable.
Let us go back and examine the reported circumstances of the “exile” of Israelites from Jerusalem to Babylon. The interpretation (that is, propaganda) and facts presented by Israelite scribes do not resonate. They make the LORD angry with Judah and Israel a) because their priests and prophets have lied to the people and caused them to serve other gods; and b) because their kings and nobles have judged un-righteously.
The LORD commands prophets, priests and people to “Listen to my voice, and do all that I command you. So shall you be my people, and I will be your God, that I may perform the oath which I swore to your fathers (Abraham and Moses) to give them land flowing with milk and honey.” (Jer, xi, 1-5)
(You see, the right to choose one’s religious belief was, and is, not permissible to these people. It’s very convenient: no one can blame them for crimes related to the domination of a nation: for, they persuade themselves that, “The LORD commands that we be his people, and that we desolate the earth.”)
He commands the kings and nobles of Judah and Israel to “Do justice and righteousness, and deliver from the hand of the oppressor him who has been robbed. And do no wrong or violence to the alien, the fatherless, and the widow, nor shed innocent blood…”
If the Israelite LORD‘s commands are not obeyed, he warns, “I will make Jerusalem a heap of ruins, a lair of jackals; and I will make the cities of Judah a desolation, without inhabitants.” (Jer, ix, 11)
He, in other words, threatens to destroy the homes and possessions of “the alien, the fatherless, and the widow” in order to punish lying priests and prophets and those who have judged un-righteously.
It makes perfect sense – if we view it from the perspective of justice turned upside down.
So, what happens?
“Thus, says the LORD, the God of Israel: I will regard as good the exiles from Judah, whom I have sent away from this place to the land of the Chalde’ans.” (Jer, xiv, 5)
Prophets and priests, kings and nobles of Judah and Israel are sent to Babylon; they are given houses and gardens, lucrative tax-collecting positions and – of course – tons of gold and silver.
When descendants of these exiles (42,360 men plus uncounted children and women), some seventy years later, returned to Jerusalem, they carried with them 7337 menservants and maidservants, 245 male and female singers, 475 camels, 6720 asses, 1.4 tons of gold and 7 tons of silver; in addition, Cyrus gave them a blank check on the Empire’s treasuries to finance the building of a temple at Jerusalem. What’s more, eighty years later, these “Israelites” were made tax exempt and were given another blank check on the Empire’s treasuries to continue building their temple. This is hardly a train of slaves. See Fires that Cry, 45; or Ezra, chapters I, vi and vii.
All of this was done when, outside of the Bible, there is no evidence of the existence of Jews, Israelites or Hebrews; but there is incontrovertible evidence (from clay tablets) that a Babylonian merchant class and priesthood exercised dominion from Babylon to the Mediterranean. This leads to the conclusion that the “exiles” discussed in Jeremiah are actually Babylonian merchants and priests.
But, let us return to our story, keeping this perspective in the back of our mind.
Apparently, these prophets and priests, kings and nobles, described in Jeremiah, pleased the LORD; for he regarded them “as good.” If this is so, why were they carried away to a “wondrous life of ease” in Babylon? And, why were those that remained – the oppressed, the fatherless, the widow – visited by sword, pestilence and famine?
Something is wrong here. That they were carried away to a “wondrous life of ease” in Babylon means that these priests deceived, and these kings and nobles judged wickedly. That those that remained were destroyed means that such behavior was pleasing to this Jewish god. How else can we explain it? If these exiles had obeyed the LORD, they were supposed to have been left in Judah and Israel, without any destruction.
Since they were sent away, it would seem to mean that they did not speak according to the word of God, nor did they judge “righteously”; and, for these failures, they were supposed to have been punished. I am so confused.
All the patter about false prophets and tyrannical judges served as a thin coating of sugar on a tablet of arsenic. All the gabble of Jeremiah is intended to convey the subliminal message that “the LORD, the God of Israel” was invented to make it a sacred duty to reward sleaze and wickedness; and, by natural consequence, to “utterly destroy” the oppressed, the fatherless, the widow.
Now, to perpetrate this world-wide domination requires a small nation with a long history: the subjugation of Russia, for example, could not have been done by a group of cutthroats randomly selected on the spur of the moment. People needed for this Russian project had to be recruited, trained and tested a) to the effect that they could be commanded to commit crimes so enormous and so heinous that such crimes would shock an ordinary conscience into disbelief; and b) to the effect that these cutthroats would know when to keep their mouths shut.
More, the success of this Russian project required a small nation of brother cutthroats outside of Russia who dominated the media (and many other industries) of each country, and who would conceal or misrepresent events in Russia.
Owing to the magnitude of this operation, a minimum of three million satanic cutthroats were required for the work inside Russia, and a similar number was required for the work outside Russia; a minimum of six million in all.
Magnitude is not the only consideration; it would have required decades, maybe several lifetimes, for these cutthroats to enter into and dominate the media and other industries of each country.
The essential point here is that the Bolshevik Revolution required a small nation of thieves and cutthroats, several lifetimes in preparation, before it became a possibility. In fact, that nation had been recruiting and training its members, and refining its procedures for millennia.
Another consideration: it is a law of nature that, in any group of individuals, there will never be one hundred percent agreement among its members. Thus, not all members of the Jewish nation agree with, or are aware of, the real aim of Judaism. And here is the dilemma of Zionism: although it violates the dictum that Jews should not establish a Jewish state, it will still serve the purpose of world destruction. The Jewish nation is ruled by a triumvirate composed of rabbis, notables (the very wealthy) and scholars; every member of this triumvirate literally has the power of death over all other Jews, thru the law of the pursuer (din moser) and of the informer (din rodef); these are explained later. It makes no matter: despite the ignorance, disagreement, or innocence of ordinary Jews (Zionists included), they serve a very useful purpose for the Jewish aim of world destruction. When persecuted peasants inevitably rise up against their Jewish oppressors (the ruling triumvirate), ignorant and innocent Jews are fed to the angry mob – thus, causing valid anger to be wrongly expressed. Dominant Jews, then, misrepresent the scene and the resulting sympathy is used to gain more power, and more booty; and more chains for those who have no vision – or, who refuse to use it.
Code of Behavior
As noted, before Jews can begin the conquest of a nation, they have to recruit, train and test the personnel for such a project. Several millennia ago, Jewish/Babylonian (Israelite or Hebrew) scribes and priests began to formulate a code of behavior designed to recruit and mold a nation of cutthroats – and clothe them with the authority of “God.” This was nothing new: if we view the recent history of religion – crusades, inquisitions/witch-hunts, religious wars, the Dark Age and a thousand other genocides, we come to the conclusion that religion has always been invoked as a justification and instrument of tyranny. And, we regard it as a miracle that there is still human life on this planet.
We have examined procedures by which Jews dominate and destroy nations; now we examine the code of behavior that must be shoved into the Jewish brain. It includes five major “virtues”: xenophobia, plunder, non-assimilation, statelessness and a perverted ethical code (a suspension of reason and reversal of justice).
Since rational men regard most of these “virtues” as various forms of evil, they have to be conveyed beneath the threshold of spoken or written words – a kind of subliminal communication; for, to advocate these “virtues” openly and directly would naturally alarm all non-Jews (or non-cutthroats), and allow them to effectively arm themselves against Jewish bandits. Instead, these five major “virtues” seem to be subliminal derivatives of what Jews regard as two ultimate “virtues” – according to the station and capacity of each individual Jew. First among Jewish “virtues” is the study and debate of religious writings; the second “virtue” is to obey dictates and commandments found in Jewish sacred texts.
Ideally, a Jew should read the Torah, Talmud, or Kabala eight, ten or twelve hours a day. These writings are founded on some of the most tyrannical episodes ever penned by man.
Moses, for example, is a central character in the lore of Judaism. Jewish/Babylonian priests invented a new god and then made it issue a commandment to Moses regarding Jewish rules of engagement, which is the essence of military law… that is, the law of conquest:
When you draw near to a city to fight against it, offer terms of peace to it. And if its answer to you is peace and it opens to you, then all the people who are found in it shall do forced labor for you and shall serve you. But if it makes no peace with you, but makes war against you, then you shall besiege it; and when the LORD your God gives it into your hand you shall put all its males to the sword, but the women and the little ones, the cattle, and everything else in the city, all its spoil, you shall take as booty for yourselves; and you shall enjoy the spoil of your enemies, which the LORD your God has given you. Thus you shall do to all the cities which are very far from you, which are not cities of the nations here. But in the cities of these peoples that the LORD your God gives you for an inheritance, you shall save alive nothing that breathes, but you shall utterly destroy them, the Hittites and the Amorites, the Canaanites and the Per’izzites, the Hivites and the Jeb’usites, as the LORD your God has commanded; that they may not teach you to do according to all their abominable practices which they have done in the service of their gods, and so to sin against the LORD your God. (Deut, xx, 10-18)
A later story demonstrated the application of these rules. The war against Midian was precipitated by an Israelite man who brought home a Midianite woman as his wife. Moses became enraged that an Israelite man would take a foreign woman as wife; after the Israelite man was killed, Moses sent an army to slay every Midianite man, woman and child. When the army returned with Midianite women and children, Moses became furious and ordered that all these should be killed saving all females “who had not known man.” It has been a long tradition in the Arab world that wealthy men travel the world to purchase orphaned girls; and that, in that same world, females, regardless of age, are regarded as rightless sex objects. Since barbaric behavior is moderated with time, we can estimate that by the command of Moses, all females under eight, maybe six, years of age (thirty-two thousands in all) were saved alive, and distributed among the army, people and priesthood as sex slaves; see Num, xxv and xxxi.
The story is noteworthy for its maniacal brutality and for a type of ingratitude the Jewish god finds pleasing. When Moses is first introduced in Jewish legends, Pharaoh is harassing him and, we are told, wants to kill him; Moses escapes into the desert where Midian priests give him refuge, teach him his religion, and give him two, maybe three, wives. (Ex, ii, 16-22; iii, 1; Judges, iv, 11
Hence, to Moses (and, by extension, to all his adherents), it is a capital crime to espouse a foreign female (except for Moses, of course); and a sacred duty to fornicate with those same foreign female children as sex slaves.
What makes the story so heinous is that it is, most probably, invented. Its purpose is not to convey historical facts – but to convey quasi-subliminal messages that, wanton murder, plunder and sleaze are God-protected and God-commanded activities.
If a rational man were to read the Torah – or any related writing, he would be revolted or put to sleep within five minutes. If a Jew reads these works without either of these results, it means that he has suspended his rational faculty and his sense of justice. During the time that he studies these works of gore and nonsense – and to the extent that he suspends his reason and justice, he is incapable of productive labor. He must be supported by someone who does engage in productive labor; that is, someone who – from Jewish perspective – is willing to engage in ethically inferior activity.
The subliminal messages here are a) that productive labor is ethically inferior activity (a kind of crime) relative to the study of writings of long-dead barbarians, and b) that it is “virtuous” to live on booty taken from people who, by the gabble of ancient con-men, are represented as ethically inferior. Preferably, booty should be taken from non-Jews; but, if dull-brained Jews don’t get the subliminal messages, well… they deserve to be plundered until they do get the message.
The attitude that productive labor is an ethically inferior activity is reinforced by the commandment that Jews should do no work on the Sabbath. An activity is either beneficial to life (and, therefore, a virtue) or detrimental to life (and, therefore, a vice – or crime) without regard to time or place. Thus, if it is wrong to commit murder or robbery on one particular day or place, it is wrong every day and every place. So, how can it be legal to work on one day, and not on a different day?
Another aspect of the “virtue” of studying gore and nonsense is that it is “virtuous” to suspend reason and justice, which allows Jews to describe the activities of depriving non-Jews of their lives and property as performing the “work of the LORD.”
The second most “virtuous” activity consists of obedience to the daily routine commanded by Jewish scribes and priests – disguised as commandments from God. Most impartial observers refer to this set of rules as the most restrictive chains ever laid on the shoulders of men. It leaves not a particle of activity unregulated: it mandates what foot should first hit the floor upon rising in the morning; which comes first – to shave, or brush one’s teeth; what to do with one’s spittle, cut finger nails; and, can one do these things on the Sabbath? And interspersed with all these regulations is the requirement for each Jew to give praise to the Jewish god several times a day that he was born Jew – not Goy.
To the extent a Jew conforms to these regulations, he is incapable of rational, independent thought –which are required for productive labor. He must survive by the labor of others. All of these conditions are perfect qualifications for the profession of tax collecting.
So, the two highest “virtues” for Jews are the study (and belief) of gore and nonsense and the obedience of dictates found in those studies. How do these “virtues” make Jews incapable of productive labor, and reverse their sense of justice?
To a rational man, a virtue is a) an activity that contributes to the welfare of human life; and b) its measure is the difficulty by which it is achieved. To voluntarily earn wealth is to guarantee that no man will lose by the activity – it is thereby a rational virtue. To take wealth by force necessarily means that one or more men must suffer losses – it is thereby a rational vice (or crime). By its very nature, a virtue must be more difficult than a vice. It is more difficult to earn twenty units of money (or property) with an expenditure of eighteen units of money than it is to earn the same amount with an expenditure of nineteen units of money. They both earn twenty units, but the former only uses eighteen units to do so; he is, therefore, more efficient than the latter: he is, therefore, more virtuous.
If we were to apply these principles to the game of baseball, a rational man would regard the player with a batting average of .350 to be more “virtuous” than the player with a batting average of .250; the religious man would reverse this order. The religious man, furthermore, would subtract .050 from the former average and give those points to the latter, more inept, player: he would punish the more skillful because of his skill, and reward the inept because of his ineptitude. In real life, this is accomplished by the mechanism of the income tax – a respectable and perpetual form of selective genocide – cleansing the species of men of integrity, intelligence and productive capacity.
People are not born virtuous; this quality must be learned with constant practice and a rational, independent mind.
When men adopt the nostrum that belief in nonsense and obedience to nonsense are virtues, it would take a rational man less than a minute, by no more than his presence, to expose their “virtues” to be utter frauds. This is why, in a congregation of frauds, a man of integrity and productive ability is always an outcast – if not actually, he will be psychologically. To religious men, a man of integrity and productiveness is a mortal threat to the web of nonsense they have woven. This should explain why intelligence and a sense of justice have been regarded as capital crimes by religious men for most of human history.
So, we have established that, by subtracting reason and justice from the Jewish code of ethics, we have produced ideal tax collectors – almost. It remains to show how they have become the most efficient – or, vicious – tax collectors of history; and, therefore, the most favored. Shahak gives several examples of this from India to Spain; he reports of Poland:
Outside the towns very many Jews throughout Poland, but especially in the east, were employed as the direct supervisors and oppressors of the enserfed peasantry – as bailiffs of whole manors (invested with the landlord’s full coercive powers) or as lessees of particular feudal monopolies such as the corn mill, the liquor still and public house (with the right of armed search of peasant houses for illicit stills) or the bakery, and as collectors of customary feudal dues of all kinds. In short, in eastern Poland, under the rule of the nobles (and of the feudalized church, formed exclusively from the nobility) the Jews were both the immediate exploiters of the peasantry and virtually the only town-dwellers.
[As a consequence of this stranglehold on coercive power,] Poland was the only big country in western Christendom from which Jews were never expelled. A new middle-class could not arise out of the utterly enslaved peasantry. (Shahak, Jewish Religion… online)
The capacity to gain this stranglehold on power is the result of thousands of years of excising reason and justice from Jewish ethics and by isolating Jews from their intended victims. The latter is accomplished by the dictum that forbids Jews from assimilating with non-Jews. This is enforced by numerous devices intended to convey the attitude that non-Jews are less than human beings, have no soul, and are little more than talking lumps of flesh; that they are naturally prone to lying, stealing, adultery; a few examples,
The Halakhah presumes all Gentiles to be utterly promiscuous…Whether a Gentile woman is married or not makes no difference, since as far as Jews are concerned the very concept of matrimony does not apply to Gentiles (‘There is no matrimony for a heathen’). Therefore, the concept of adultery also does not apply to intercourse between a Jewish man and a Gentile woman, rather, the Talmud (Tractate Berakhot, p. 78a) equates such intercourse to the sin of bestiality. Shahak, Jewish Religion…, online; also, for example, Ezekiel, xxiii, 19-20.
A cabbalastic ritual established from the 17th century (and followed today by many orthodox Jews) requires a Jewish woman to take a monthly ritual bath and then have sexual intercourse with her husband; if after the bath she encounters one of the four satanic creatures (Gentile, pig, dog or donkey) she must take another bath. (Shahak, Jewish Religion…, online)
The Megiddo Modern Hebrew-English Dictionary, published in Israel, correctly defines shegetz [derivative for Shavgets (‘a gentile boy’); and Shiksa (feminine form)] as follows: ‘unclean animal; loathsome creature, abomination (colloquial – pronounced shaygets) wretch, unruly youngster; Gentile youngster’. (Shahak, online)
A Jew must not associate himself with gentiles because they are given to the shedding of blood. Abhodah Zarah (22a)
Animals of the masculine sex must not be left in the barns of the Gentiles with their men, nor animals of the feminine sex with their women; much less must animals of the feminine sex be left with their men and of the masculine sex with their women (“because they are suspected of having intercourse with them”, Abhodah Zarah 22a). Nor must sheep be left to the care of their shepherds; nor must any intercourse be had with them; nor must children be given into their care to learn to read or to learn a trade. Abhodah Zarah (15b)
In fol. 22b of the same book the reason is given why animals especially of the feminine sex must be kept away from their women: “…because when Gentile men come to their neighbors’ houses to commit adultery with their wives and do not find them at home, they fornicate with the sheep in the barns instead. And sometimes even when their neighbors’ wives are at home, they prefer to fornicate with the animals; for they love the sheep of the Israelites more than their own women.
Another essential derivative, and subliminal, “virtue” (or, more properly, a commandment) is that it is unlawful for Jews to establish a country, with territorial boundaries, of their own. The Jewish mission is the destruction of all nations. For this purpose, all Jews are subliminally instructed to become tax collectors, which makes them incapable of productive labor. For this reason Jews are forbidden to establish their own country in order to avoid the spectacle of a nation of thieves stealing from one another.
(Most Jews fought the establishment of the state of Israelup until the day of its establishment; then, Orthodox Jews switched sides so they could go inside Israel and control or influence its affairs. They survive by squeezing American peasants for three to five billion in hand-outs every year. Non-Zionist Jews are now trying to provoke Arabs to slaughter one or two million Zionists (including the million or so former Judeo-Bolshevik bureaucrats, who have too many stories to tell – as long as they remain alive, that is) so other Jews can use the sympathy card as they have used it relative to the make-believe Holocaust of World War ii. See Fires that Cry, op. cit.)
So, what is the sum total of this code of behavior? They are all necessary to gather and mold a congregation of tax-collectors – as polite society calls them.
Again, this code of behavior has five main components: Jews are molded 1) to regard productive labor to be the work of animals; 2) to be xenophobic; 3) to not assimilate with non-Jews; 4) to not form an ordinary country for themselves and 5) to suspend reason and reverse rules of justice.
The doctrine that productive labor is ethically inferior activity operates to drive Jews into tax-collecting professions if they want to live beyond the poverty level. If a Jew earnestly complies with Judaic law, he is incapable of productive labor; if he still insists on earning an honest living – and owing to his sacred ineptitude, he will have to labor ten to fourteen hours a day just to put scraps on his table. His only escape – if he must remain a Jew – is to enter a profession that allows him to take the property of other men.
Xenophobia assures that he will be less bothered by guilt or compassion, toward all men in general, as he deprives non-Jews of their lives and property.
The ban against assimilation prevents the Jew from establishing bonds of friendship, with non-Jews. Such bonds of friendship would reduce or eliminate the effectiveness of the Jew as a collector of taxes; and create the possibility that he might divulge secrets and information that would incriminate the Jewish nation.
This need of Jews to conceal their totalitarian nature is most urgent, and long standing. In any society, there will never be unanimity of thought: in every brotherhood dedicated to criminality, there will always be a few individuals who just do not get the message: they will object to wrong-doing – and will threaten to expose it. To deal with this prospect, Jews developed din rodef (law of the pursuer) and din moser (law of the informer). The first law commands every Jew to kill or severely wound any Jew who is perceived as ‘intending to kill another Jew.’ What rabbis and Jewish scholars mean by this phrase is that ‘any Jew who informs non-Jews about the criminal activity of another Jew is intending to kill another Jew.’ The second law is similar: it requires every Jew to kill or severely wound any Jew that informs non-Jews about Jewish affairs, about Jewish money or property or delivers Jewish property to the jurisdiction of non-Jewish authorities. A Jew can fall under either of these “laws” by the mere word of a rabbi, a Jewish notable, or a Jewish scholar. (Shahak, Israel, Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel, (Pluto Press, 1999) 137-147.) Both “laws” serve the dual purposes of securing Jews in their criminal activities and concealing their extensive loot. (Encyclopedia Judaica (1974), vol. 8: 1370.)
The ban against statehood is imposed to prevent the murderous spectacle of Jews cannibalizing each other; for, a nation of tax collectors would have no one from which to collect taxes – they would have to steal from each other, or from a captured nation – as the state of Israel survives by plunder taken from American taxpayers.
And, Jews are able to justify all this because, owing to their religious studies and commandments, they must suspend their reason and reverse their sense of justice; lest they behold guilt beyond measure.
I titled this article ‘Exodus #23’; I do not know if the Soviet Exodus is number twenty-three, number fifty-nine, or number one hundred and eight. To accurately determine its number would take many years of research; and, even then, it could only be closer to the truth. It would simply be impossible to obtain an exact number. The history no longer exists; for every manuscript that comes down to us relating to man’s story, Jews have destroyed whole libraries. Besides, with regard to its number, exactitude is only a curiosity. The important thing to realize is that, while an ordinary murderer may kill one or a dozen men, the nation of Jews makes it a religious duty to murder whole nations.
When men of shallow soul are told that such behavior is pleasing to their god, they will practice the activity with reckless abandon, and make a slaughterhouse of the earth – as four out of five pages of every history book will testify. And the fact that it is made a holy practice removes all restraints to its practice. “No man can look upon that as wickedness, which shall render him sacred; nor fear to attempt that which shall make him God’s viceregent.” (Sidney, Discourses concerning Government, i. 19.)
In this regard, the story of the Soviet Union is a duplication of countless crimes of the past. It is only one of the more recent such crimes; crimes that will continue to be perpetrated so long as men do not understand them, or do not understand who is responsible for such crimes.
Please take notice that all Comments will be moderated. Normally, I check in with this website once every 4-5 days. Currently, however, I’m dealing with two or three major issues that may cause my response time to take up to two weeks. In the meantime, please be patient. Thanks for visiting, ALH
Timely and Related pages
Home. From the beginning of human societies, every habitable acre of the planet has been dominated by bodies of private men. These bodies have gone by many names: magicians, elders, priesthoods, army, senate, merchants, land holders were names of long ago. Today they go by names such as Council on Foreign Relations, American Bar (Bankers, Medical) Association, the 300, Defense Department Contractors, Oil Cartels, Drug Cartels, Communist Parties. There are many more. Generally, they are all known as assemblies. And, unfortunately, in a very high percentage of the time, such assemblies have been used by those with criminal, or tyrannical, intent. After reading 30,000 to 50,000 pages of original histories, I found only three examples where assemblies were used to advance the cause of liberty: Athens, England and America – all of which were eventually sabotaged.
One in Ten Thousand. This relates how English rebels (1620-50) took down corrupt judges and tax-collectors, bishops and kings who thot they had a divine right to impose taxes or debt on other men without the latters’ consent; men who, 150 years later, would guide American rebels. These examples represent some of the most dramatic and significant scenes in the long struggle from barbarism to civilized society – scenes that have almost been completely erased from current history and law books.
Who Owns City Hall? Several years ago I stumbled across CAFRs, Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports. These are issued by cities, counties, special districts, states, among others. Of all those I examined (several dozen), the entity in question had enough cash on hand to operate for up to six years without collecting a penny of taxes. Two questions eventually arose in my mind, “Why are they still collecting taxes?” and “When do I get my dividend?”